
To edit a multicam interview, sync all your camera angles to a common reference, lock the story by selecting the strongest moments from the transcript first, then cut between angles for rhythm and to hide your edits, and let your NLE handle the angle switching from a synced multicam clip.
Multicam interviews are a gift and a trap. The gift is options: a wide, a tight, a side angle, maybe a B-cam on the interviewer. The trap is that every one of those angles is more footage to sync, more decisions to make, and more ways to burn an afternoon switching shots that do not need switching. The editors who stay fast keep the order strict: sync first, story second, angles last.
Before anything else, every camera has to line up on a single timeline so a moment at 00:12:04 is the same moment on all of them. You have a few ways to do it:
Once synced, you collapse the angles into a single multicam clip (a multicam source clip in Premiere, a multicam clip in Resolve, an angle clip in Final Cut). Now playback shows all angles at once and you switch between them with a click or a number key. The sync work is done once, up front, and it is the foundation for everything after.
Here is the part most people get backwards. They start cutting angles immediately, picking shots while also trying to decide what the interview says. That is two hard jobs at once, and it is why multicam edits sprawl.
Separate them. Decide what the interview says first, with the angles out of your head entirely. The fastest way is the transcript. Transcribe the interview, read it, and select the strongest self-contained moments, the same paper edit approach documentary editors use, codified by Michael Rabiger in Directing the Documentary. The words do not care which camera was rolling. You build the story in text, get the order right, and only then bring the pictures in. Now angle selection is a creative finishing pass, not a fight with content.
With the story locked, cutting angles becomes the fun part. Two principles carry most of it:
Cut to a new angle when there is a reason: a new thought, an emotional beat, a shift in energy. Switching every few seconds for the sake of it looks restless. Switching on a meaningful turn in the answer feels intentional and guides the viewer's attention.
This is the quiet superpower of multicam interviews. When you cut two pieces of a sentence together from the same angle, you get a jump cut, the subject's head jumps. But if you switch to a different angle at that exact splice, the cut becomes invisible. The eye accepts the new framing and never notices you removed ten seconds. A single B-cam angle can make an aggressively tightened interview look completely smooth. It is the multicam version of hiding a cut behind B-roll, except you do not even need B-roll.
You shot a sixty-minute founder interview on two cameras, a tight A-cam straight on and a wide B-cam from the side, cutting to a five-minute piece. The slow path: you make a multicam clip and start playing it from the top, switching angles and trimming as you go, deciding story and shots simultaneously. Three hours later you have a rough cut that wanders, because you never decided what it was about before you started.
The fast path: you sync the two cameras by audio and make the multicam clip, then set it aside. You transcribe the hour, read it, and select your five minutes of story on the page. You bring those selects to the timeline in order, now it is a five-minute structure, not a sixty-minute search. Then you do one focused pass cutting angles: A-cam for the direct, intimate lines, a switch to the wide B-cam on every internal splice to hide the tightening, and a few motivated cuts to the wide when she leans back to think. The angle pass takes maybe thirty minutes because the story was already locked. For more on building the structure, see cutting down a long interview.
Multicam buys you flexibility and clean, hidden cuts, but it costs storage, sync time, and a heavier timeline. For a simple talking-head piece, a second camera can be overkill, one angle plus good B-roll often does the job. Reach for multicam when you know you will tighten heavily and want the cuts invisible, or when the interviewer and subject both matter on screen. And no number of angles fixes a weak story; the angles are finishing, not foundation. For the single-camera approach, see editing a talking-head video.
The story-first half of this, the part that keeps multicam from sprawling, is the pre-edit, and it lives outside the NLE. With ScriptCut you transcribe the interview, read the transcript with word-level timecodes, select the strongest moments, remove fillers, and arrange the order before you build anything. Then you export a ready-to-cut timeline to DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro, where you sync the angles and do the multicam pass on a story that is already shaped. You spend your NLE time on what NLEs are great at, syncing and switching angles, instead of on discovering the story one playback at a time.
Sync once, decide the story on the page, and the angle pass becomes the easy part.
The reliable default is audio sync, where your NLE matches the waveforms across cameras automatically using each camera's scratch audio. If you jam-synced timecode on set, the NLE lines them up by the numbers, and a slate or hand clap at the top gives a manual fallback.
Decide the story first. Lock which moments you are keeping and in what order, ideally from the transcript, before you switch a single angle. Choosing story and angles at once is the biggest time sink in multicam editing.
When you tighten a sentence, cutting two pieces together from one angle causes a visible jump cut. Switching to a different angle at the splice makes the edit invisible, so a single B-cam can make a heavily tightened interview look completely smooth.
For a simple talking-head piece, one camera plus good B-roll often does the job, and a second angle adds storage, sync time, and a heavier timeline. Reach for multicam when you will tighten heavily and want invisible cuts, or when both interviewer and subject need to be on screen.